For the milk (and code repository) intolerant.

So this is something that i had left to the bin, on the right side of my brain,
for a while.

I am wont not to be a jessica. For the most part.

I feel that being collected is tragedy enough. (And being serially incompetent, is a git-hub code of love gifted unto others.) Maybe we can be met with abject heft of who we are, instead of what we might become - to fit the visions of another of “who we are”.

But why are we subjected to the millions of slow, changes that qualifies as something of a fractal-creation into the ether? Or do our minds subject itself individually? Is this why we are herded, by nature into crowds, into groups, into a corralled minster of other people’s quite compelling torrent of mind spell that they can’t in their stand offer up quite openly. Imagine your dad, the very serious lawyer, having to order a very common doughnut from the shoppes? Absurd.

But this is exactly the circumstance in which we were brought up in, and later found (in other people’s commentary) that this was unusual, and was not done. And later, bound to live a frustrating life, have to subject myself even further into the borders of capacity, and being held captive with what should be the corresponding field of unlimited time, and effort at making it count.

Is this what frustration looks like?

And are scientists pressed hard at finding out what makes people tick, as well as how they make use of their natural given time limit on earth - do they actually know the fixed passing of each one? Are they even close?

What makes interaction in the now crucial as ever, is having no clue when we are to kick the proverbial bucket. And people, with the kamikaze mindset of those filthily-resourced enough to think that time is something they can usurp - from others, from generations ahead - make use of their time not as obligingly, but consider themselves either nuked with possibility (maddening), as well as too combed a path (precision-impossibility).

We are not stupid.

And blindingly, we work hard at making that plain. Because, not all people have the code, or the resilience at working it out, or even the adjunct possession of actual password to develop a “fork” in the repository of life, and its intricate knowledge that contains all the answers.

Do you think you should have it easy? Or do you really think there’s a golden gate to the heavens of knowledge - that siri that will TELL you everything that you need to know? When you need it, as and when you have brought yourself short of having any parity to the roads that bring it - or to the process that might actually let you imbibe most of what life had not brought to your attention, or lap up other people’s mildly amusing experiences, in the guise of learning.

I think if we were objective about it all, we will have the utopia at hand in like the next decade - technology giants not barring. I would have thought it happen in the time of Steve & Jony, but i guess they have paved the way, and the rest of those who should now keep up with prodding on with WHY we need this, should dismantle the effects of HOW, and WHERE, and other trivialities that may be barriers to actual improvements.

All I’m saying is that with the imminent AIs unbound, we are likely to find one or two protestations because, we realise that life is not plain, or complex-in-guise, but really something. else. entirely. that crucially, crucially, we need all the minds working together to figure it out, and be not a barrier to others’ moving forward, or along (verticals are harder when there’s an x-axis of laterals in the community - culture clashes, and other mindless human things we conveniently get distracted by when there’s a pressing deadline, commonly called procrastination), but finding time to actually be aware, but not disillusioned, nor dismantled by these - is useful.

We shouldn’t feel barred by, and pressing on, is actually not meant to be the task, but is. This coefficient to this societal friction, is in itself a barrier to real adsorption (to different varying degrees, at length, and width & breadth of helm) - but mostly to knowing ourselves. And this is now a problem of growth, by and large, of others’ doing, and we need a whole other team to safeguard this. And keep the detractors at bay.

In the name of growth, and perhaps, the making of a common tomorrow real and progressive.