Contributeurs de la publication.
This Holy Monday of Mondays, there is a paper in which I try to explain the dilemma of product building. Getting people to write for you.
When writing is essential to product, the refining of the product is having expert Writers, (scripts as well as code, sometimes an interchangeable act), at the seat of the table and helm the prow to get your product shipped as fast, and unwieldy to the very vast horizon of weather implements.
The sordid appeal of blogs is that there are a thousand casts of glances at a view, a social milieu, and the hosts of problem surrounding any sort of building in the age of adulthood. There are no more effective, in my case, tools in my toolbox than those of highly effective communication, not intuition.
I have been part of a team that once had that mural that kept everyone at a direction that led to the matchbox track of diminutised paths, but carrying on the work of what could only appeal to a few knowledge-bearers and nothing but, would be superficial to the community that need these products and bear them to a totem flagpole of builders. Is this an elitist viewpoint? Maybe. But it is entirely mine.
Creating a whole host of understanding and ways to understand common matters at hand, gives you the newspapers, that honourable journalists kill themselves over facts for, as well as the periodicals and journals that would carry on the search for scientists, and medical analysts for years to come. These studies, being reduced to a joke (not socially amplified stoicism but a trivialisation of knowledge), is not a participle of entertainment. It is however a sign that people have grown the cognitive mind, and the wandering spirit that lets them collaborate with others who have the infusions of rigour and intellect. This, in a successful meeting of minds, is not a mere downplay of talent, but a sign of a diversified activation of choice from an ecosystem that is steeped in various exposures, and results in an evolved enculturation (and furthering) of thought.
The Spanish have their telenovelas, and the must-have sprinkling of drama in their everyday lives surround their lives with hailing to the people who can express themselves in prose and poetry with flair. The Italians, have food and cultural refinement in their Arsenal, as well as fashion, as interchangeably as they can with the French. Culinary pursuits are as hot a ticket as products are for Silicon Valley participants. The Americans take their balding very seriously, as the Europeans their culture. The Asians have in their arsenal a right to their uncaricatured bind of respect and proprietary building of themselves in their place in society. When their best comeuppance would be to not have been acknowledged or not have been able to understand themselves, where would we place ourselves in a stance to society, and in fact ourselves, with?
What is that commonality that we can thread with everyone, to build more of and to certify what good there is left in the world? Will that be in common stance with the face that you have? Or in the caricature that you feel you have generated, and lighten up with? Will your farce of a life be understood by only some, or ambitiously, in the mainstream of all?
As the point threads, you can pinpoint the elusivity of actual, as we all evolve and move throughout the timelines that affords us the casual and communal talks that we take part in, very fortunately or being enabled by some. Those who get the participles, don’t dangle in the limited, they expand their thoughts and include the charity that is a necessary evolution that holds more than just the momentary lapse of judgment, and caricature this into a taxation effort of the frail humanity to find out what the human cognitive can really afford to pay mind.
Is this merely a syntax of effort? Maybe we need college courses, and the tedium of multiple post-graduate efforts to let us in on the gestures and stable instances that might lead into more than just the entertaining reads. But those who can afford the fray into a lighter format of the really deep-and-dirty complicated, the surgically annotated are committed to help, and be found readily when needed. Sort of like that Microsoft Word document animated paperclip icon in word perfect versions of the past that hangs around on the upper right hand of the page urging you to click on it for help.
There are the clicks, and there are the people who just exist to observe, write commentary & critiques, and find appropriate solutions to the cleaner evolve.
Happy minding-your-Ps-and-Qs Monday.
