Trep that.

I think the way we build ecologies, depend on sensibilities - and we can’t help the influences of what’s already built-in, and recovered intrinsic properties. (*This part may turn a bit racist, but take it in context, and comment if you disagree very violently, i will try to be most impartial to categorisation.)

There are things that are built in as features - whether we are actually aware of them or not, but it’s best to be aware, so you don’t just act accordingly. Especially if these traits are actually undesired. Being conscious is the key.

If you have jewish or chinese ethnicalities and are sensitive with the handling of money (this is understood to be built-in) whether you had little or none of it, you are viewed culturally in a general spec - which i would call here, randomly occurring (and probably a real effective of living in a large, diverse society) as the minority effect. Or if you are spanish or frugally french in nature, you are naturally competitive more with the compendiums of freedoms & your individual rights to improve in your ability / strength - even as familial respect, and traditions dictate otherwise, as living in the modern / new world could sometimes sound out a bit more in what is called the more “common sense”.

In global societies, whether we intend to or not, are geared by mainly the university programmes that we subscribe & adhere to (should you choose or be chosen to be schooled by either public or private institutions), and should be aware that the influences mature or solidify in these places, more likely, and would cement your knowledge of life, social dependencies, primary interactions and most probably time economies as a prime result. Your families are a close second - where they are the shell in which you are most dependent upon for unconditional approval, and un-compromised adulation. (Buying your mom flowers to say thank you does not commit you to her social gains, as it is her duty to shower you with unending praise & support. It is not considered a corporate bribe, i don’t think.)

It isn’t that we envelope or concern ourselves in the mired apology that is our natures, but the mere compatibility equations actually hinge our very happiness towards progression, or retardation. And relying on other people’s sensibilities are equivalent, and tantamount to creating a “ferris-wheel-dimension” where the oppressors become the oppressed and vice versa, but if unregulated would exit to a runaway train of holocaust proportions.

Those of us who are possibly the ones stuck in the middle, possibly because we are of very timid, sound, un-acoustic stereo mindsets, or buried in mid-size proposition of plain apathy - are just not as predisposed to the preferred / societal recommendations to empower the masses on their culling of inauthentic means to happiness.

Though it is a consideration to take things with a grain of sea salt, or earthly mud when things happen for naught, or an inexplicable reason, it should be not a public matter - it should always be taken into advisement with the right people, circles, and the rights of the individual summoned to guide, but not coerce what the masses have socially dismissed as “not for everyone”, as it should. This consideration is something that’s taken privately, as this occurs in the silences of your heart, and not the squabbling bubble of polity.

This submits to the highest priority of being able to not take things for granted, but that remains a contextual approach to all relationships. Why would Kendall Jenner say hello to me in the street, or i to her, when i only “know of her” as a celebrity, not a personal friend who’s come by to my place, know my children and had dinner at one point. In smaller cities, the associations are that of a local village - but with those upbringing in larger societies, these distinctions extend to a larger grid, and have a sensibility of being “a snob” in smaller towns, but “normal” in huge cities. So, it’s likened to that of the “big pond, small fry” mentality. Charming, but good to know why things happen, people react a certain way, and why certain equations and formulas do not work. Some things are not portable, hence not sustained in mobile. Sussing them out, would be the job of everyone who attempts the comparative leaps and bounds to ecosystems we hadn’t known about - the stretch can be painful, and the proper steps, necessary.

The individuations are multiplied into the age of borders - we submit a proposal to expand, and sustain, as well as collapse &n compress systems to accommodate the future, but in doing so, we should never forget (and remind ourselves to do it well, and fast) - what we have to do to maintain in the present.